The San Antonio Spurs are in a tricky situation as they approach the 2026/27 season. With 13 roster spots filled, they must decide how to utilize their remaining two spots. Here's an analysis of the options, with a heavy focus on personal commentary and opinion.
The Continuity Path: Jordan McLaughlin and Bismack Biyombo
This option prioritizes stability over upside, which is understandable given the team's current makeup. McLaughlin, a solid bench player, fits the Spurs' culture and can provide steady game management and spot-up shooting. His return on a minimum contract makes sense, especially with his age and finished product status. Biyombo, on the other hand, is a veteran leader who commands respect in the locker room. His role as a mentor and coach is valuable, especially with the team's depth at big men.
However, this path might be too conservative. McLaughlin's role could be limited, and Biyombo's lack of athleticism and skill might hinder his impact. The question is, are these players the best use of the team's resources? I argue that while they provide stability, they might not offer the most dynamic or exciting contributions.
The Maximum Depth Path: Signing Veterans
Signing top veterans might seem ideal, but the Spurs' limited minutes could be a challenge. Players like Bruce Brown, Jordan Clarkson, or Cole Anthony might be interested, but their expectations should be managed. The risk of locker room issues is real, and these players might demand more minutes than the Spurs can offer. Mitch Johnson's approach to managing minutes will be crucial here.
The challenge is finding players who are willing to take the minimum and embrace a role where they might not start. This path requires a delicate balance between talent and team dynamics. It's a risky move, but one that could pay off if the right players are found.
The Youth and Upside Path: No Players Over 25
This strategy is all about looking for the next Julian Champagnie. The Spurs could target undrafted free agents and G League talent, offering them non-guaranteed or partially guaranteed contracts. This approach is risky but could pay dividends if a player like Champagnie emerges. The team's developmental system in Austin is a plus.
However, this path sacrifices some reliable depth and costs flexibility. It's a long-term investment that might not pay off immediately. The Spurs must be patient and selective, ensuring they don't waste resources on players who don't develop as expected.
The Savings and Flexibility Path: Keeping a Spot Open
This option maximizes flexibility. By keeping one spot open, the Spurs can easily add a player or convert a two-way contract without waiving anyone. It's a strategic move, especially with limited room under the tax. However, it might hinder the team's ability to add depth at two positions, which could be a concern.
The decision to use this spot wisely is crucial. While it provides flexibility, it might not be the best use of resources if the player doesn't contribute significantly. The Spurs must weigh the benefits of flexibility against the need for reliable depth.
In my opinion, the Spurs should consider a mix of these paths. They could sign a veteran for depth and a young player with upside. This approach balances continuity, talent, and development. Players like Jordan Clarkson or Cole Anthony could be targets, but the team must be selective and patient.
The Spurs' challenge is to find the right balance between stability, talent, and development. It's a delicate dance, and the right combination of moves could shape their success in the coming seasons.
